Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Report of a Scientific Study
Factual communication is vital for ensuring accurate interpretation of information sent to an audience. It is objective that all forms of sending and receiving information ensure clarity and evidence-based on their findings. Journalists and researchers constitute a vital category of sharing knowledge through their communication practices. The former profession entails presenting news to people who reflect a given society (Jacques et al., 2020). Their findings are based on field research, with many reports made short and concise due to time restrictions. Information shared across mass media by journalists end up in news desks, newspapers, popular magazines, and social networks (Stanley-Becker, 2019). Similarly, researchers play a collective role in educating the intellectually elite regarding vital findings made after field research. The experts communicate their findings in journal articles using factual scientific evidence. Most importantly, this analysis presents a comparative discussion regarding how information is presented to potential audiences (Shahar et al., 2018). The style of reporting by journalists is different from researchers based on the tone, skepticism, and facts of major findings after field research.
The objective of sharing information is to develop the knowledge required for effective decision-making. The article relating excessive use of phones and the development of two protruding bones identifies the technique of driving emotions among the readers (Stanley-Becker, 2019). Fundamentally, the news article authors claim that young adults constitute a substantial category of victims with horns coming from the skull. The piece of communication seems to caution against too many computerized devices that have transformed individuals social and economic lives. Despite the benefits of technology innovation in handheld devices, the journalists warn against potential health complications of maintaining certain body postures (Stanley-Becker, 2019). As noted in the article, prolonged use of phones asserts the existence of long-term physiological challenges evidenced in the protruding bones (Shahar et al., 2018). As a result, the style of reporting is intended to drive public audiences emotions as parents and guardians can limit the use of the devices to prevent similar complications later in a childs life.
From a personal perspective, the information presented in the news article seems to be exaggerated and misleading. The articles title is intended to persuade the audience to understand the strange physiological phenomenon attributed to excessive phone use. In essence, the articles first sentence attracts public audiences of vital age groups associated with the social practice (Jacques et al., 2020). The content can be misinterpreted to imply the development of bad social behavior among individuals arising from handheld devices prolonged use (Stanley-Becker, 2019). Journalists adopt communication strategies intended to enticing consumers to read through a news article (Stanley-Becker, 2019). Their collective wages include commission accrued from the number of users who read the article. Subsequently, it is logical if journalists use content that attracts readers irrespective of facts.
Moreover, the journalistic article presented on the platform feels skeptical when evaluated from specific viewpoints. For instance, the authors claim that young adults occupy a substantial category of victims identified as protruding bones from the skull (Scheufele & Krause, 2019). According to scientific evidence regarding anatomy, many medical causes can result in the human bodys physiological change (Shahar et al., 2018). For instance, heavy manual duties in a warehouse contribute to a similar phenomenon among workers with handheld devices. In this case, the presentation seems skeptical since not all young adults have access to prolonged use of technology devices. Additionally, a long-term consequence of a social behavior takes a long time to manifest its evidence in the human body (Jacques et al., 2020). For instance, active smokers face the risk of lung cancer during later stages in life. As a result, it sounds skeptical that individuals can grow protruding bones from the skull as young adults.
The main suspicion noted from the journalistic presentation is related to information gathering. Findings obtained in the report came from an experiment in which young adults were used as research participants (Jacques et al., 2020). The X-rays conducted on them indicated a slight change in the skull structure, with two bones protruding behind the neck (Stanley-Becker, 2019). According to the findings, the phenomenon affects young male adults more than females of the same age category (Stanley-Becker, 2019). It indicates that the latter has a low prevalence of mobile phone use, raising suspicion on the results obtained. The presentation lacks facts regarding how much phone use results in the protruding bones (Jacques et al., 2020). It is objective that substantial claims relating to medical facts and social behavior among people depict relevance and universal application of recommendations. Suspicion in news presentation reduces integrity and influence of communication among public members.
Differences Between the Research Article
I used scientific journals with peer-reviewed content to investigate the news report. In essence, these sources are useful in determining the facts presented in support or opposition to a claim. In this case, claims presented in the report are serious and be instrumental in discouraging certain social behavior, such as the needless use of smartphones (Stanley-Becker, 2019). However, claims by the journalist are strong hence require scientific evidence for actual proof. Most importantly, peer-reviewed journal articles are based on scientific evidence of facts obtained from a field experiment. Authors of journals seek expert input in a report from professionals specializing in a particular field (Jacques et al., 2020). In this discussion, the journals used to investigate the physiological outcomes regarding protruding bones from the skull include the contribution from anatomists, physiologists, and psychologists (Scheufele & Krause, 2019). The contribution would be useful in confirming the accuracy of findings acquired from x-rays from the participants.
In essence, the news report of the science left our other significant results attributed to excessive phone use among young adults. For instance, individuals identified as potential victims of smartphone devices should also suffer eyesight problems. (Stanley-Becker, 2019) It is important to note that handheld gadgets contain different contrasts and light emissions behind the interactive screen. Using a cellphone for long periods can affect normal eyesight due to light and color variations (Jacques et al., 2020). This outcome should have been mentioned in the report as an associated problem with protruding bones from the skull behind the neck. Most importantly, the news report displayed bias with a different tone intended to convince the public audience concerning the dangers of prolonged use of computerized devices (Stanley-Becker, 2019). Communicating scientific evidence aims at presenting factual evidence for authentic and accurate reporting to potential targets (Shahar et al., 2018). The approach aids the audience in making individual decisions not influenced by misinterpreted journalistic content.
Moreover, the news report seems to overstate and misrepresent facts acquired from the scientific process. For instance, the findings claim that excessive use of smartphone devices results in protruding bones from the skull and affects more males than females. That conclusion raises suspicion as excessive use of phones is individually determined (Stanley-Becker, 2019). Assumptions made regarding time spent in front of a digital device are inaccurate as it depends on ones activity using technology devices. Misinterpreting information in scientific research is critical in influencing the behavior of the targeted audience. In this case, it is possible to find conservative parents going through the article placing tough restrictions on computer and smartphone usage among their teenage children (Scheufele & Krause, 2019). Fundamentally, the cause and effect approach associating smartphone use with physiological challenges among users is insufficient for making a substantial-conclusion entailing behavioral change among young adults.
This task has been useful in understanding imminent differences between research and journalistic writing. For instance, the former style incorporates factual evidence acquired after a comprehensive study on research participants. However, news reporting by journalists is intended to attract individuals for revenue generation purposes (Scheufele & Krause, 2019). It is vital to ensure accuracy when presenting research findings to the readers. Communicating scientific reports requires the collective contribution of a multi-professional team working on a study (Jacques et al., 2020). In this perspective, the journalists are expected to collaborate with scientific researchers to assert claims made on extensive use of technology devices. This approach will be useful in separating communication content intended to inform the public instead of presenting bias. The article in discussion attracted intellectual criticism, with some professionals claiming bias in reporting vital findings (Stanley-Becker, 2019). Most importantly, using peer-reviewed journals from authentic sources can aid news reporters to ensure accuracy and avoid bias when communicating to the public.
References
Jacques, T., Jaouen, A., Kuchcinski, G., Badr, S., Demondion, X., & Cotten, A. (2020). Enlarged external occipital protuberance in young French individuals head CT: Stability in prevalence, size and type between 2011 and 2019. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1-9. Web.
Scheufele, D. A., & Krause, N. M. (2019). Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(16), 7662-7669.
Shahar, D., Evans, J., & Sayers, M. G. (2018). Large enthesophytes in teenage skulls: Mechanical, inflammatory and genetic considerations. Clinical Biomechanics, 53, 60-64. Web.
Stanley-Becker, I., (2019). Horns are growing on young peoples skulls. Phone use is to blame, research suggests. The Washington Post. Web.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.